DenyAsk

The recent Telegram interview with newly-minted Tory leader Ches Crosbie leaves a disturbing impression of how he will address the challenges of a Party recently described on this Blog as �broken�. The Telegram article saw Crosbie shifting the blame for the Muskrat Falls project onto the Liberals. �What they should have done was make sure that a proper stopgo analysis was done as soon as they got into office. They frittered that opportunity away,� he was quoted as saying. Crosbie is correct on the point, but he needs to deal with the ghastly mistakes of his own Party before he is ready to throw stones at his rival. Not to his credit, Crosbie asserted: �� PCs are like everyone else in this world: we�re only human. If mistakes were made we�ll have to take the approach that that was then, and this is now,� he told the reporter. Crosbie could be forgiven if Muskrat was actually just a �mistake�. But his assertion barely dignifies civility. Indeed, the view puts him at risk of falling into ...

The following is Nalcor VP Gilbert Bennett sharing, in his words, a �mark-up� of the very first Independent Engineer�s Report on the Muskrat Falls project. Bennett is sending the email to Ed Martin, Paul Harrington, James Meaney, and PR types Karen O�Neill and Dawn Dalley. The email reads: Hello All: Attached is a mark-up of the November 29 report. Proposed redactions are highlighted in red. Once we�re all good we can lock these in. Once Jim has circulated the appendixes from the November 29 report, I will update accordingly for the full package. If you have any changes, please let me know� Regards, Gilbert First, just in case you missed it, what Gilbert Bennett is in possession of and is �marking-up� and seeking �changes� in is not a Nalcor Report. It is, ostensibly, the �independent� work of the so-called �Independent Engineer� for the Muskrat Falls project. The year was 2013. In all, there have been a total of 20 IE reports made public since that time. We can reasonably assume that ...

Imagine if the Auditor General allowed the Department or Agency it is auditing to edit or redact parts of its Report to the House of Assembly. Wouldn�t the public lose all respect and trust afforded to that Office? Evidence has now been uncovered showing that the �independence� expected of the Independent Engineer for the Muskrat Falls project, on behalf of the Government of Canada, was never established; that at the very beginning Nalcor was permitted to review, edit and redact the Reports before they became public. The issue of independence was always a worry for the small group of critics of the project. Such scepticism was captured by an Uncle Gnarley Blog Post entitled How Independent is the Independent Engineer? It raised the question following the IE�s first Report (November 29, 2013).   Material evidence of complicity between the IE and Nalcor, which only recently came to light, suggests that those suspicions were justified. The Uncle Gnarley article, written in June 2014,...

Guest Post by David Vardy Sometimes revelations occur and information comes to light which sheds real insight into the mysteries of Muskrat Falls. Uncle Gnarley has just reported on such revelations. Through an ATIPPA request our avuncular friend secured correspondence between the Premier and SNC Lavalin which offers insights into a number of interrelated matters, not the least of which is the relationship between government and Nalcor. Also intertwined in these exchanges are concerns about water management, liquefaction of sensitive clays and methylmercury contamination.   Uncle Gnarley reported on these mysteries in his post at  " Extremely Frustrated" Premier Goes To SNC-Lavalin For Advice .  The Premier wrote to SNC Lavalin to seek advice on the impact of raising and lowering water levels upon erosion of the river banks on the Churchill River. The response from SNC Lavalin urged caution with respect to such variations in water levels, similar to the advice r...

The following statement is not correct: �Running at full output, Churchill Falls (CF), would discharge about 2000 cubic metres per second into the Churchill River. Assuming no reservoir draw down, this level of discharge from CF would by itself provide about 630 MW of production at Muskrat Falls. We could run MF at a higher output level for a period of time and draw down the MF reservoir� we could keep it at Muskrat Falls as well as anywhere else.� That was Gil Bennett talking a couple of years ago to law student and political Blogger, John Samms, who is now on staff in the Premier�s Office. Note the word �drawdown� to which I will return. At the time Bennett was telling Samms how Nalcor intended to access surplus power from the Upper Churchill; the amount that exceeded what Bennett erroneously thought was the full contractual power commitment to Hydro Quebec. That assumption didn�t work out too well for Nalcor, the Quebec Superior Court having ruled that Hydro Quebec is entitled to al...

The most recent Abacus Poll reflects a NL society increasingly aware of its fiscal circumstance. A realism long missing has returned. Six in ten people now see budget deficits and jobs for the young as a very big problem. Infrastructure, jobs in general, and health care are matters of similarly high concern. Just possibly the public possesses fewer expectations of their political leadership than even the politicians believe. Scepticism seems to underscore the new Abacus Poll, and for this reason alone it a refreshing read. Polls are frequently less a reflection on the subjects assessed than of the populace whose views are being aggregated. It is hard not to sense in the Abacus data that NL is in a state of readiness for change.   Bear in mind that this is a place essentially coming off a big drunk. The metaphor �spending like drunken sailors� is apt. It explains why it has been impossible these past ten years to motivate the public � and, hence, the Government � to a different cour...